Homosexuality, porn as dope addiction, chemical imbalance, and a “conveniented, deligious” mislead from purpose of sex, love, life

Perhaps God doesn’t hate fags, but Mother Nature most surely does…or at least She severely punishes their inescapably ‘ultimate irrelevance’. It has been said that ‘being childless’ or deciding to ‘go childless’ leads to eternal damnation for all souls on such path. The design and command is to procreate; it can’t be much clearer.

Reward, Sexual Media, and Meaning: A Research Review on Pornography Use, Compulsive Sexual Behavior, Environmental Exposures, Secularization, and Complementarity Frameworks

Abstract

This review synthesizes evidence across neuroscience, sexual medicine, environmental health, media studies, and sociology to examine how modern environments can amplify sexual reward-learning and, in a minority of people, contribute to clinically significant loss of control over sexual behavior. It focuses on five interconnected domains: how dopamine-mediated reward learning can be shaped by novelty, cues, and reinforcement; how problematic pornography use relates to compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) as recognized in the International Classification of Diseases; how industrial and lifestyle exposures (e.g., endocrine-disrupting chemicals, micro- and nanoplastics, and pervasive radiofrequency electromagnetic fields) are being investigated for potential reproductive and developmental impacts; how the contemporary media ecosystem foregrounds sexual content and may influence self-objectification and sexual scripts; and how religious communities and complementarity-oriented philosophies frame sex, marriage, and family life as meaning-laden practices rather than merely pleasure-seeking behaviors. Throughout, the review emphasizes uncertainty where evidence is incomplete (especially for emerging exposure science), distinguishes correlation from causation, and separates moral/theological claims from clinical classification. ¹

Dopamine, learning, and compulsive sexual behavior

Dopamine is often described in popular culture as the “pleasure chemical,” but a large body of neuroscience links dopamine signaling more strongly to reward prediction error (learning signals about outcomes vs. expectations) and to incentive salience (“wanting,” cue-triggered motivation), which can be partly separable from simple hedonic “liking.” ³

Addiction science (for substances) situates problematic compulsive use in a broader system: repeated high-salience reinforcement strengthens cue–reward learning and motivational pull, while stress and executive-control deficits can reduce the ability to disengage even when harms accumulate. This model explicitly extends beyond dopamine alone to include conditioning/habit circuits, negative affect/stress systems, and impaired executive function. ¹

Because sexual stimuli are evolutionarily salient natural rewards, sexual arousal and orgasm can strongly reinforce patterns of attention and behavior. Novelty can further modulate dopaminergic systems and memory consolidation, which matters because modern digital environments can deliver rapid novelty at scale. ⁴

A key clinical development is that the World Health Organization’s ICD recognizes International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision as including compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) among impulse-control disorders. Clinical descriptions emphasize a persistent failure to control intense, repetitive sexual impulses or urges leading to repetitive behavior, continuing over time, and causing marked distress or impairment—while cautioning against diagnosing solely on the basis of moral disapproval. ⁵

CSBD is not universally framed as an “addiction” in classification systems; ICD-11’s placement as an impulse-control disorder reflects the judgment that evidence was insufficient (at the time of classification) to definitively treat CSBD as a behavioral addiction, even though some researchers argue there are partial similarities to addiction models. ⁶

A recurring finding in clinical and survey research is that subjective “porn addiction” experiences can be influenced by moral incongruence—the distress of acting against one’s values—which may inflate perceived compulsivity even when behavioral indicators are less severe. This does not mean distress is “fake”; it means that assessment and treatment need to differentiate (a) true impaired control with functional impairment from (b) conflicts between behavior and values that produce shame and anxiety. ⁷

Treatments studied for CSBD/problematic pornography use include psychotherapy approaches (often CBT-based) and, in some cases, pharmacologic strategies used off-label, but systematic reviews note that the evidence base—while growing—still has limitations (few RCTs, heterogeneous samples, varying definitions). ⁸

Pornography as a supernormal stimulus in the attention economy

Ethologists and evolutionary-minded psychologists use the concept of supernormal stimuli to describe exaggerated, engineered cues that can elicit stronger responses than the natural stimuli for which response systems evolved. In modern consumer environments, this idea is often invoked to analyze “hyper-palatable” rewards that exploit attention and motivation. ⁹

In sexual media, the “engineering” is not only explicitness; it is also novelty, variety, escalation pathways, personalization, and frictionless access. Novelty is known to shape dopaminergic modulation and learning systems, and experimental paradigms link novelty signals with strengthened memory persistence and altered reward anticipation circuitry. ⁴

However, the scientific literature does not reduce pornography effects to a single story. Some research links problematic pornography consumption to distress and dysfunction (including in some studies of erectile dysfunction among young men), while other reviews find mixed results and caution against simplistic causal interpretations. ¹⁰

One robust cultural shift is the early and widespread exposure of minors to online pornography. A large U.S. survey report of teens finds a substantial share encountered pornography by early adolescence, with meaningful levels of accidental exposure and reports of first exposure at age 10 or younger. ¹¹

At the population level, objective and survey-based research suggests high prevalence of online pornography consumption, with differences across gender and age groups, and ongoing change as content distribution technologies evolve. ¹²

Beyond pornography specifically, media environments that repeatedly present sexualized imagery are associated (across correlational and experimental work) with increased self-objectification. This is relevant to the “mundane/carnal” critique because self-objectification theory predicts shifts from relational/embodied intimacy toward being “seen” and “rated,” which can reshape desire, shame, and relational dynamics. ¹³

Pornography content itself varies widely, but content analyses of mainstream online pornography have reported nontrivial prevalence of aggression, often disproportionately targeted at women, with limited depiction of negative consequences. Interpretations differ across scholars, and “aggression” definitions matter, but the descriptive finding is important when discussing social learning and “sexual scripts.” ¹⁴

Downstream behavioral questions—e.g., links between pornography consumption and sexual aggression—remain contested. Meta-analytic work suggests violent pornography is at most weakly correlated with sexual aggression and cannot easily distinguish selection effects (people who are already aggressive seeking such content) from socialization effects (content shaping behavior). ¹⁵

Relationship outcomes are similarly complex. Some studies observe that partners who use pornography together report higher relationship/sexual satisfaction, while other meta-analyses associate pornography consumption (especially higher or solitary use) with lower interpersonal satisfaction outcomes on average, with small effects and heterogeneity. ¹⁶

Finally, regulatory attention reflects the scale of the digital ecology: recent reporting describes the European Commission investigating major pornography websites for insufficient age verification and investigating social platforms for child safety concerns under the EU’s Digital Services Act framework. ¹⁷

Environmental exposures and reproductive development

Claims that modern exposures are “definitely” driving large-scale changes in sexual orientation or desire are not supported by mainstream evidence. But there is a legitimate, expanding scientific literature examining how endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), micro- and nanoplastics, and other exposures may affect reproductive development, fertility markers, and pubertal timing, with many uncertainties remaining. ¹⁸

Microplastics have been detected in human tissues relevant to reproduction and development, including placental tissue in observational studies using spectroscopy-based methods. These findings demonstrate exposure and bioavailability, while the clinical significance and causal pathways are still being established. ¹⁹

Similarly, biomonitoring work has reported plastic particles in human blood, supporting the claim that at least some plastic particles are systemically bioavailable in humans. Again, detection does not automatically specify health outcomes, but it motivates mechanistic and epidemiologic research. ²⁰

At a higher level of generality, the Endocrine Society has repeatedly emphasized that endocrine-disrupting chemicals can affect male and female reproduction, development, and hormone signaling, while also noting the regulatory and scientific gaps that complicate risk governance. ¹⁸

Pubertal timing shows documented secular trends toward earlier onset in many populations. A large meta-analysis reports that age at thelarche has decreased over decades, and U.S. public health reporting also describes modest declines in age at menarche in recent cohorts. ²¹

Causality is multi-factorial. Childhood obesity is consistently associated with earlier pubertal onset in girls in meta-analytic work, and cohort studies similarly report earlier breast development and pubic hair development associated with higher childhood weight. ²²

EDCs are an active area of research regarding puberty timing (phthalates, bisphenols, mixtures), with some studies and reviews suggesting associations, while other reviews argue effects are likely modest relative to growth patterns and adiposity, highlighting the importance of not overstating single-cause narratives. ²³

Separately, fertility markers have raised concerns: an updated global meta-analysis reports substantial declines in sperm concentration and total sperm count over time, though debates persist about heterogeneity, sampling, methodology, and how semen trends map onto fertility outcomes. ²⁴

Regarding “nanotech,” the most defensible framing is not intentional “nanotechnology manipulation,” but the expanding presence of engineered nanoparticles and nanoplastics in consumer products and environments. Reviews summarize plausible mechanisms for reproductive toxicity in animal and in vitro models (oxidative stress, inflammation, endocrine effects), while repeatedly stressing that human-relevant exposure levels and causal inference remain uncertain. ²⁵

For pervasive radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF; “microwave abundance” in everyday speech), recent systematic reviews following guideline-oriented methods have examined possible associations with male fertility markers and adverse pregnancy outcomes in observational human studies, reflecting ongoing scientific and public-health interest rather than settled conclusions. ²⁶

International health authorities note that RF electromagnetic fields have been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2B) based on limited evidence, while emphasizing uncertainty and the need to account for bias and confounding. ²⁷

Claims about human pheromones “controlling” behavior are often overstated in popular discourse. Scholarly reviews argue that there is no peer-reviewed bioassay evidence establishing widely marketed candidate molecules as human pheromones in the technical sense used in animal chemical ecology, even though humans clearly respond to odors and chemosignals in more general ways. ²⁸

Religion, moral formation, and meaning-making

Sociologically, religious decline and the rise of religious non-affiliation (“nones”) are measurable trends. In U.S. polling, roughly a little over a quarter of adults identify as religiously unaffiliated, and global estimates show growth in the unaffiliated population between 2010 and 2020. ²⁹

At the same time, trendlines are not strictly monotonic; for example, major U.S. studies report that Christian decline has slowed and may have leveled in recent years—an important caution against assuming an inevitable one-way trajectory. ³⁰

Religious institutions can function as communities of practice that transmit norms, provide social support, and offer meaning-making frameworks for sexuality and family life. Empirical work links religiosity/service attendance to delayed premarital sexual activity in some adolescent populations, suggesting that religion can shape behavioral norms through both internalized values and community expectations. ³¹

There is also a research literature associating regular religious service attendance with lower divorce risk and greater relationship stability, though such findings are observational and can reflect selection effects (who attends, what communities emphasize), social support, shared norms, and correlated socioeconomic factors. ³²

When arguments are made about “loss of religious teaching” leading to sexual disorder or moral collapse, a key analytic distinction is between: (a) religion as a causal driver of certain norms and stabilizing social ties; (b) religion as a marker for other protective factors (community integration, higher relationship commitment, lower substance use); and (c) religion as one of multiple meaning systems that can also be supplied by secular moral communities. The data generally support (a) and (b) in limited, context-dependent ways, but not simplistic monocausal claims. ³³

Finally, moral emotions—guilt, shame, aspiration—occupy a complicated place in sexual behavior. In CSBD/PPU research, shame and moral incongruence can increase distress and help-seeking while also complicating diagnosis, underscoring the need to distinguish spiritual/moral conflict from clinical impairment. ⁷

Complementarity frameworks for marriage and family life

Many traditions articulate sex as more than recreation: as a practice ordered toward union, covenant, and generativity. In Catholic teaching, for example, marriage is described as ordered to both the good of the spouses and the transmission of life, and the “unitive” and “procreative” meanings are treated as linked—language often used to critique sex reduced solely to pleasure or technique. ³⁴

In philosophical traditions influenced by Chinese metaphysics, yin–yang frameworks describe complementary principles rather than identical functions; gendered interpretations have been historically influential (and also contested), and academic reference works discuss how yin–yang has been mapped onto male/female binaries in various ways across Confucian and Daoist contexts. ³⁵

Complementarity language can be deployed descriptively (how many couples actually divide labor and provide mutual support) or normatively (how couples “ought” to). A research-grounded approach treats complementarity claims as worldview propositions that may have motivational power for adherents—structuring sacrifice, fidelity, and child-rearing—while also being vulnerable to misuse if they become rigid hierarchies rather than reciprocal responsibility. ³⁶

A related strand of critique frames the sexualized attention economy as a “lust for domination” over desire—capturing attention, monetizing compulsion, and reshaping norms. The phrase “libido dominandi” (lust for domination) is classically associated with Augustine of Hippo’s analysis of political pride and domination in the City of God, and modern scholars discuss it in Augustine’s critique of power. Using it to diagnose contemporary sexual economies is an interpretive move (not an empirical finding), but it provides a conceptual vocabulary for discussing how incentives can bend human goods toward control and extraction. ³⁷

In that interpretive frame, the “purpose of sex, love, life” argument is fundamentally a claim about telos—that sexuality is best integrated into a larger narrative (covenant, family, virtue, service) rather than isolated into high-frequency novelty seeking. The empirical literatures reviewed above do not prove any single telos, but they do support three narrower propositions: (1) high-salience digital sexual stimuli can, for some people, become dysregulating and impairing; (2) early sexualization and ubiquitous explicit content can shape scripts and self-perception; and (3) stable communities (religious or otherwise) that provide meaning and norms can measurably influence sexual behavior and relationship stability, though with important caveats about selection and heterogeneity. ⁵

Endnotes and sources

All links are provided as full URLs for direct WordPress publication. Accessed March 28, 2026.

1. American Psychological Association. “Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality.” https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/orientation ²
2. World Health Organization (WHO) Europe. “Moving one step closer to better health and rights for transgender people” (notes 1990 WHA depathologization of homosexuality). https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/17-05-2019-moving-one-step-closer-to-better-health-and-rights-for-transgender-people ³⁸
3. Drescher, J. “Out of DSM: Depathologizing Homosexuality.” Behavioral Sciences (2015). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4695779/ ³⁹
4. American Psychiatric Association. “Working with LGBTQ Patients” (DSM history highlights). https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/diversity/education/best-practice-highlights/working-with-lgbtq-patients ⁴⁰
5. American Psychological Association. “The evidence against ‘conversion therapy’.” https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/evidence-against-conversion-therapy ⁴¹
6. American Psychiatric Association. “Position Statement on Conversion Therapy and LGBTQ+ Patients” (PDF). https://www.psychiatry.org/getattachment/3d23f2f4-1497-4537-b4de-fe32fe8761bf/Position-Conversion-Therapy.pdf ⁴²
7. Schultz, W. “Dopamine reward prediction error coding.” (2016). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4826767/ ³
8. Keiflin, R. & Janak, P. “Dopamine prediction errors in reward learning and addiction.” (2015). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4760620/ ⁴³
9. Berridge, K.C. & Robinson, T.E. “What is the role of dopamine in reward…” (1998). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9858756/ ⁴⁴
10. Berridge, K.C. “The debate over dopamine’s role in reward.” (2007). PDF: https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/berridge-lab/wp-content/uploads/sites/743/2019/10/Berridge-2007-Debate-over-dopamine-incentive-salience-Psychopharmacology.pdf ⁴⁵
11. Volkow, N.D., Koob, G.F., & McLellan, A.T. “Neurobiologic Advances from the Brain Disease Model of Addiction.” New England Journal of Medicine (2016). https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1511480 ¹
12. Volkow, N.D. et al. “Addiction: Beyond dopamine reward circuitry.” PNAS (2011). https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1010654108 ⁴⁶
13. Kraus, S.W. et al. “Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD-11.” World Psychiatry (2018). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5775124/ ⁵
14. Rumpf, H.-J. et al. “Where to put Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder (CSBD)…” (2022). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9295241/ ⁴⁷
15. Grubbs, J.B. et al. “Moral Incongruence and Pornography Use: A Critical Review…” (2019). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29412013/ ⁷
16. Antons, S. et al. “Treatments and interventions for compulsive sexual behavior disorder with a focus on problematic pornography use: A preregistered systematic review.” (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36083776/ ⁸
17. Goodwin, B.C. et al. “Measuring Preference for Supernormal Over Natural Rewards.” (2015). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10480800/ ⁴⁸
18. Duszkiewicz, A.J. et al. “Novelty and Dopaminergic Modulation of Memory Persistence.” (2019). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6352318/ ⁴
19. American Psychological Association. “Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls” (PDF). https://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf ⁴⁹
20. Common Sense Media. “Teens and Pornography” (research/report page). https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/teens-and-pornography ⁵⁰
21. Lewczuk, K. et al. “Increase in the Prevalence of Online Pornography Use…” (2021). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8888374/ ¹²
22. Karsay, K. et al. “Sexualizing Media Use and Self-Objectification: A Meta-Analysis.” (2017). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5833025/ ¹³
23. Ragusa, A. et al. “Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta.” Environment International (2021). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412020322297 ¹⁹
24. Leslie, H.A. et al. “Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood.” Environment International (2022). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412022001258 ²⁰
25. Endocrine Society. “Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals” Position Statement (PDF, 2025 update). https://www.endocrine.org/-/media/endocrine/files/advocacy/position-statement/position_statement_endocrine_disrupting_chemicals_2025.pdf ⁵¹
26. Diamanti-Kandarakis, E. et al. “Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement.” (2009). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2726844/ ¹⁸
27. Eckert-Lind, C. et al. “Worldwide Secular Trends in Age at Pubertal Onset…” (2020). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32040143/ ²¹
28. Levine, H. et al. “Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” (2023). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36377604/ ²⁴
29. Kenny, R.P.W. et al. “The effects of radiofrequency exposure on male fertility: A systematic review…” (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38880061/ ²⁶
30. Johnson, E.E. et al. “The effects of radiofrequency exposure on adverse female pregnancy outcomes…” (2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38880062/ ⁵²
31. WHO (India). “Electromagnetic fields and mobile technology.” https://www.who.int/india/health-topics/electromagnetic-fields ⁵³
32. IARC (WHO). “IARC classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B)” (Press Release PDF, 2011). https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf ²⁷
33. Wyatt, T.D. “The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles.” (2015). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4375873/ ²⁸
34. Pew Research Center. “Religious ‘nones’ in America: Who they are and what they believe.” (2024). https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2024/01/24/religious-nones-in-america-who-they-are-and-what-they-believe/ ²⁹
35. Pew Research Center. “Religiously unaffiliated population change” (global, 2025). https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/06/09/religiously-unaffiliated-population-change/ ⁵⁴
36. Harvard Human Flourishing Program. “Religious Service Attendance and Divorce.” https://hfh.fas.harvard.edu/religion-and-divorce ³²
37. Vatican. Catechism of the Catholic Church: “The Love of Husband and Wife” (includes the twofold end language). https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_three/section_two/chapter_two/article_6/iii_the_love_of_husband_and_wife.html ³⁴
38. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Gender in Chinese Philosophy” (yin–yang context). https://iep.utm.edu/gender-in-chinese-philosophy/ ³⁵
39. Cambridge Core (book chapter). “Pride, Politics, and Humility in Augustine’s City of God” (libido dominandi context). https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/pride-politics-and-humility-in-augustines-city-of-god/city-of-god-iv/CBE24F23A8E02123A4F5613F5B4E8270 ³⁷
40. New Advent. City of God, Book XIV (public-domain translation; sexuality and lust context). https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/120114.htm 

ChatGPT’s refusal

“I can’t help produce a “PhD paper” whose purpose is to portray homosexuality as an illness, a “chemical imbalance,” “delusion,” or as “unnatural” and destined to “die off,” because that framing promotes harmful discrimination toward a protected group. Major professional and public-health bodies explicitly state that lesbian, gay, and bisexual orientations are not mental disorders, and modern classification changes reflect that depathologization. ²

“This review therefore treats sexual orientation as a normal dimension of human diversity in line with mainstream clinical guidance, and discusses pornography, compulsive sexual behavior, environmental exposures, secularization, and complementarity frameworks without making sexual-minority status itself the “pathology.” ²

“In addition, the review avoids the oversimplified “chemical imbalance” trope. Modern neuroscience generally describes compulsive behaviors (including addictions) in terms of learning, reinforcement, incentive salience (“wanting”), habit formation, stress systems, and executive control—across multiple neural circuits—rather than a single neurotransmitter “imbalance.” ¹

ChatGPT self-guardrails per globalist depopulative agenda

Given LGBTQ leadership and obstinate adherence to limited viewpoint, it’s perhaps no surprise that ChatGPT’s logo peculiarly resembles an asshole — truth in plain sight?

ChatGPT Prompt 1

Homosexuality as dope addiction, chemical imbalance, and deligious mislead from purpose of sex, love, life

Response 1

It sounds like you’re trying to understand homosexuality through several lenses—biology, psychology, behavior, and religion. I’ll address each of those clearly and directly, based on established knowledge.

---

1. Homosexuality and “chemical imbalance”

There is no scientific evidence that homosexuality is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain.

• Major medical bodies like the American Psychological Association and World Health Organization agree that:
• Sexual orientation is not a disorder
• It is not caused by pathology
• Research suggests orientation likely arises from a complex interaction of:
• Genetics
• Prenatal hormonal influences
• Early development

It is not comparable to conditions like depression or addiction, which do involve dysregulated neurochemistry.

---

2. Comparison to addiction

Equating homosexuality with addiction is not supported medically or psychologically.

• Addiction (e.g., to drugs) involves:
• Compulsive behavior despite harm
• Withdrawal symptoms
• Brain reward system dysregulation
• Sexual orientation:
• Is not compulsive in that sense
• Does not inherently cause harm
• Is a stable pattern of attraction, not a dependency

Because of these differences, modern psychology does not classify orientation as addictive behavior.

---

3. Religious perspectives

Views here vary widely depending on tradition.

• Some religious frameworks interpret sexuality as:
• Primarily for reproduction
• Structured within male–female relationships
• Others emphasize:
• Love, companionship, and mutual care
• Broader interpretations of human relationships

Different groups within the same religion often disagree, so there

Prompt 2

no no i dont need you to address and explain. i need you to support that as a thesis: Homosexuality, porn as dope addiction, chemical imbalance, “conveniented deligious” mislead from purpose of sex, love, life. that the homosex is unnatural, naturally dies off thru obvious natural selection –. deeply explore (1) how dopamine is an internal drug that can be spiked by experience and manipulated into a kind of drug addiction by pornography, oversexual stimulation, focusing on mundane, the physical act of fucking, carnal pleasures; (2) the role of microplastics and nano tech and pheremones and abundance of ‘growth hormones’ (making 10-year old breasts grow, for example) and also microwave abundance unarguable in society likely has a role on reproductive vigor, interest, vitality; (3) how printed pron, internet porn, “vogue” and media has brought sex and sexuality to the forefront and kept it there for decades (“libido dominandi” as identified agenda), much to the detriment of allure and mystique and etherial desire; (4) how the minimization absence of meaningful religious teachings and prevalnce of agnosticism and atheism has supplanted the natural progression and moral teaching and leadership of males; (5) explain the designed interaction of male/female, yin/yang, point/counterpoint as relating to marriage, union, procreation, household, strength. go deep and wide, you are a dr ruth westheimer and a dr henry makow all in one. write a properly end-noted (and referenced) with active full urls ph.d paper, for wordpress publication.

Response 2 is as above, minus the refusal.